top of page

Case study: 
Claims Management

Anchor 1
demolition.jpg

CASE STUDY OVERVIEW

 

Introduction and Key Issues

​

Company A is a NW SME demolition contractor trading for over 23 years – direct to clients and as sub contractor to T1 Contractors.

 

Having been awarded a contract for a Banking Client via a Main contractor – Company A found themselves being under paid and in conflict.

 

Recovery of funds due against WIP and route to determination, and actions to avoid it occurring again – IDP innovation challenge intervention

Summarising the Outcomes

​

Recovery of cash against WIP sum in intervention period of over £360,000 • Transferable / replicatable process to inform communication approach and future management strategy of T1 interface • Methodology and actions to reduce risk of future repetition of this scenario – potential client assessment checks and validation, prior to accepting awards and opportunities. • Upskilling of key team members • beneficial use of 3rd party networks.

​

Problem

​

Through good intentions and a hunger for business, Company A found themselves in a complex project within their technical capabilities and experience, … but outside their commercial skills and experience of dealing with a confrontational exploitative main contractor. The situation could have been avoided by a more robust opportunity suitability protocol and process. (IDP consultancy intervention outcome.

​

For the intervention and outputs read the full case study (click here).

​

​

Excerpt from the case study showing the summary and conclusion.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

bottom of page